Help us make the Firewalla AP

Pinned Featured

Comments

648 comments

  • Avatar
    Firewalla
    We have started to ship some orders on 1/13/2025. The process is automated and will last around 30 days. (Please be patient and please don't ask us when your order will be shipped. Our support team will not know the shipping details)

    When your order is shipped, you will receive a tracking number (via email) and another email reminding you to sign up for beta mode on your Firewalla Gold/Purple before you receive the unit.

    Please be patient as we ship your units. In the meantime, please check out the AP7 guides:
    2
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Brian

    I was looking to pick up 3 of these, but my reminder got messed up and I missed out unfortunately. Will there be an email going out to announce the next presale? (Hopefully next month?) or what’s the best way to stay up to date for the next chance to purchase?

    Really excited to try these and do away with my current poorly performing mesh solution.

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    akshayrao

    Just wanted to check if folks on the thread have gotten the shipment and any tips to share for initial install & configuration?

    Patiently checking email to see if my order shipped out, not yet :)

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Firewalla

    There are lots of posts here https://help.firewalla.com/hc/en-us/community/topics/36636938904595-Firewalla-Access-Point-AP7

    and If you follow reddit: https://reddit.com/r/firewalla, there are daily posts on AP7 

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Firewalla

    If you are interested in the ceiling version, please follow this https://help.firewalla.com/hc/en-us/community/posts/37792568274067

    The unit is almost ready, the only thing we need to do is make a special mounting adapter to replace the existing T-bar mount. (The unit we are using was designed for enterprises, so they did not consider mounting at home). The T-bar mount will still be available with a small cost. 

    2
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    DanM

    Good looking unit, exciting

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Andy

    @Firewalla How far along are you all with shipping?  I ordered in the minutes after pre-sales was opened up.  I think there were 3 rounds of shipping so far. 

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Firewalla

    @Andy, please follow this thread for shipping https://help.firewalla.com/hc/en-us/community/posts/37363172164243-Firewalla-AP7-Early-access-beta-Shipping-Status

    The last shipment will happen on 2/3 or 2/4 

    If you need more units, we will have more coming in late February to early March. The price at the moment will be>330 and may be higher if there are additional tariffs before these land in California. Quantity is still limited, but for sure more than the first round. Order for these will happen late Feb to early March

     

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Ben Larkins

    @andy what order number were you?  I'm 91888, ordered 3 unites at 12:03pm EST on 1/7.  I guess I'll be in the last shipment group next week on 2/3 or 2/4 along with you.  

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Troy Dampier

    91926 - and I was at 12:05 EST on 1/7 :)  Looks like I will be in the same group :)

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Andy

    @Ben  LOL  I'm 91889 so right behind you.  Also ordered 3. 

    -Andy

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Ben Larkins

    FW team, I'm sorry if I missed this but as I wait for my order of 3 to ship next week, can you tell me the dimensions (hxwxl) of the FW AP7's?  I'm planning to wall mount mine on a floating shelf.  

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Andy

    @Ben Larkins
    Dimensions: 5.43 x 3.15 x 7.48 inch

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Firewalla

    Just posted the AP7 Ceiling version survey https://forms.gle/w3w3VcBszX6BwJYH7

    Please complete this if you are interested in ordering either the AP7 Desktop or AP7 Ceiling in March 2025

     
    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    XRaptor29

    Can we expect an AP7 Pro with 4x4 on 2.4ghz, 5Ghz and 6Ghz? Saw the company you're using for the white box and they do have a higher spec AP with multiple Ethernet ports on the back.

    2
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Firewalla

    The problem with using 4x4x4 is the size of the unit; those units (even desktops) can be huge, hot, and expensive. There may be some benefit with more spatial streams, but the cost/value may not benefit the majority, hence the price is going to be much higher.

    The same goes for a ceiling mount. The upcoming version (AP7C) is roughly 7.5x7.5" inch square, it is not small (and hot). If we go with a 4x4x4, the size will be much BIGGER, and for typical homes with 8ft/9ft ceiling, it will look huge ... (plus the price is higher...) 

    Will we ever build a huge version of both, it depends on the success of the simpler/cheaper/cooler units success. 

    2
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Derek Seaman

     @Firewalla I agree with sticking to 2x2x2 for the consumer market. Heck, even the very high end enterprise grade Ruckus R770 is only 2x2x2 on 2.4/6 GHz and only 4x4x4 on 5 GHz. The typical client density in a residential environment does not warrant 4x4x4. 

    2
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Eibensl

    @Firewalla:  For the ceiling mounted AP7, agree that 2x2 is generally the way to go, though I would like to see either the 5GHz or 6GHz get bumped up to 4x4; whichever the primary band will be for mesh connections between APs.  

    There's a good write up from a wifi/radio engineer out on TP-Link's community forum that explains why, generally, 4x4 is market hype (except for when two APs are connected via mesh):

    https://community.tp-link.com/en/business/forum/topic/714926

    If all of your ceiling mounted AP7s will have wired backhaul, then 2x2x2 appears to be the way to go.

    2
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    DummyKid

    @Eibensl, AP7 is using 6G radio on wireless backhaul that maybe the reason why 6G has 4x4. MLO wireless backhaul is not available on AP7 at the moment and I doubt if it would be available since 2.4 and 5g radios are 2x2

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Firewalla

    I believe we did make MLO work with 6ghz and 5ghz, and didn't see much difference with just 6ghz. If 6ghz is fully utilized, you can get a backhaul speed (just backhaul) close to 6gigabit ... which is likely more than enough 

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Eibensl

    @DummyKid:  clarified my comment to indicate I'm speaking of the ceiling mounted AP7, which, currently, is 2x2x2.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Firewalla

    So far, from our AP7C survey, the majority will be doing wired backhaul with the ceiling version. If you are not (and want to purchase AP7C), please complete the survey https://forms.gle/w3w3VcBszX6BwJYH7

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Mark9

    @Eibensl: I have always preferred 4x4 as my understanding is that 4x4 reaches a bit further than 2x2, which can sometimes mean fewer AP's.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Steven

    @Mark9: 4x4 MIMO does not reach farther than a 2x2 MIMO.  The 4x4 is usually faster data send and receive transfer.  The key that everyone needs to realize is that overall a 4x4 on 2.4, 5, and or 6 will generally allow for faster transfer of the data. And in order for a device to take full advantage of that, the client needs to support 4x4. 

    As an example, the flagship device from Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max only supports Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) with 2x2 MIMO.

    There are a few whitepapers on the benefit of a 4x4 on a particular band in highly saturated environments with a large number of clients and or neighboring SSIDs with overlapping, however, as Firewalla has stated their initial strategy is not to chase the fastest download and upload speeds and being at a price point of around $300, we can just add additional access points if your saturating becomes an issue.

    Also in regards to wireless backhaul, I would recommend using the desktop model which is a 4x4 MIMO, where the ceiling mount is only 2x2 MIMO. Realistically where at all possible wired backhaul is an ideal choice (even if that means having to run a cat6 cable)

    2
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Eibensl

    @Mark9:  While 4x4 improves mesh connectivity between APs, as far as client support goes, 4x4 doesn't look to provide any improved capabilities unless all of your clients are 4x4 capable; and there are very few, if any, 4x4 capable clients out there.  As soon as you begin introducing non-4x4 capable devices into your network, then 4x4 AP performance degrades (and you are no longer 4x4)...you are right back to 2x2 APs.  

    2
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    DummyKid

    I think benefit of 4x4 is good for wireless backhaul between APs since 4x4 provides more bandwidth than 2x2. AP7 only uses 6G radio for wireless backhaul so technically is good enough. However, if MLO is introduced for wireless backhaul, 2x2 radio on 5G is not good enough

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Mark9

    @Steven, @Eibensl, @DummyKid: Thanks for your input!  Below are extracts on the benefits of 4x4 using Beamforming and Diversity from a great article that goes into depth on Understanding Wi-Fi 4/5/6/6E/7. @Firewalla, it would be great if you can comment on antennas and Beamforming in the AP7.


    “a 2×2 MIMO tablet connecting to an 8×8 MIMO router will only use 2×2 MIMO. But as a very significant bonus, the 'extra' antennas if there is a mismatch in MIMO levels between the client and router do not go unused, but are used for 'diversity' and 'beamforming', which extends range, and improves speed at range.”

    “Diversity: If there are more antennas than streams eg: 2×2 client to 4×4 router, the 'extra' antennas can then be used to improve link quality, and increase range. With multiple antennas receiving the same transmitted signal, the receiver can recombine all of the received signals into a better estimate of the true transmitted signal.  FCC documents discuss that the 'maximum' gain when doubling antennas is 10×log(NANT/NSS) dBi, which for a 2×2 client to a 4×4 access point, would result in a diversity gain of 'around' 3 dBi. OR a 4×4 access point to a 1×1 client means a diversity gain 'around' 6 dBi.  This explain why you really do want a 4×4 MIMO router, even though there may only be 1×1 and 2×2 client devices connecting to it!”

    “Beamforming: This Wi-Fi technology uses multiple antennas to 'focus' the transmitted RF signals more towards a device instead of just broadcasting the signal equally in all directions. The end result is a slightly stronger signal in the direction of the device, which typically causes a slightly higher modulation to be used, which in turn increases Mbps speed by a little bit.”

    “KEY Wi-Fi concept: It is easy to overlook and miss, but beamforming and diversity are the key reasons why you want a 4×4 MIMO router even though most clients are still only 2×2 MIMO. The extra antennas are actually used and offer significant value (a stronger signal, which translate to better connect speeds for far-away users)!”

    “5 GHz uses a much wider channel width 80MHz vs 20MHz and with a "wave 2" 4×4 MIMO access point with beamforming, you will see actual useable bandwidth greatly increased.”

    “Another big thing is beamforming / more antennas: After playing around with a new 4×4 "wave 2" router as compared to a 2×2 "wave 1" router, wow! A very noticeable increase in speeds at range. 802.11ac beamforming really works. Your mileage will vary depending upon construction materials. In one home single level; sheetrock with aluminum studs, I saw a dramatic increase in speeds at range. But at an older second home with very thick brick walls, range improved just a little.”

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Firewalla

    I believe all the wifi 7 AP chips from Qualcomm support beam forming. 

     

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Firewalla

    We added a "world version" AP7 survey, this will help us prioritize and talk to our ODM on how many units to build. (This survey is for people outside of the USA)

     
    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    heath

    Any consideration for an outdoor model in the future? I am currently using TP-Link Omada and use their outdoor model at a lake house to get coverage at a dock.

    It would be nice to collapse all my APs and management into a single setup. I have one house with 3 ceiling APs and another with 2 outdoor APs all managed from a single software controller (sites linked via Firewalla WG VPN).

    1
    Comment actions Permalink

Please sign in to leave a comment.