Help us make the Firewalla AP

Pinned Featured

Comments

648 comments

  • Avatar
    Firewalla

    Once we get the Desktop and Ceiling version right, it should be "relatively" easy to build an outdoor version ... given people want to use it. 

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Firewalla

    FYI: The AP7 Desktop (March) price will be set to $355.95

    Please do sign up here: https://forms.gle/w3w3VcBszX6BwJYH7; we will send you a small coupon (not as much as the beta units, but still a usable coupon to get a few eggs for breakfast)

    This price is factored in the new tariff; 

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    GK

    @Firewalla:  As mentioned by at least one other person here (maybe there are others), please consider an AP7 "Pro" Desktop version with , 12 streams (or more) i.e. minimum 4x4 across :  2.4GHz, 5GHz and 6GHz bands.  Your existing offering for AP7:  which is 4x4 only on 6GHz is actually a hardware downgrade for some of us. My existing Wifi 6 AP's have 8x8 on 5Ghz and 4x4 on 2.4Ghz.  There are still a lot of devices using the 5Ghz band !!
    Even if it does not improve range, having more streams results in much faster data transfer/ throughput. Also you may not need as many AP's to handle the same number of clients.
    Now I understand there will be people saying that you are not targeting top tier AP throughput performance, but by that reasoning - why did you make a Gold Pro Firewalla?  I'm sure there is no shortage of demand for that "high end" model.
    So - please consider an AP7 "Pro" offering with faster hardware/ more streams (at higher cost, if that is what it takes).  It should have more  RJ-45/ ethernet ports (minimum 4 with an integrated switch if needed). Sounds like your manufacturer already has a higher end model?
    Please take this as constructive feedback from a Gold Pro user. 

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Firewalla

    More antennae do have unique problems.

    1. The price is higher (up to 2x of what we are selling now)
    2. The Size is bigger. If you want the ceiling version, it is going to be huge. (the upcoming ceiling mount is already 7.5-inch square; a 4x4x4 will likely add 2 inches to each side.)
    3. Due to size, heat will be an issue for the ceiling-mounted version, so you have more gap between the unit and the wall unless we add a fan... 
    4. Unless you are running this in a crowded space with lots of devices, you are unlikely to see much benefit. 

     

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Leonid

    Hi @Firewalla, just wanted to add my voice to those expressing interest in a “Pro” version. I’m sure you are aware of ASUS GT-BE98 Pro (quad band, 4x4, etc) and it is over a year old now. You guys are amazing, and your product can be way better!

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    heath

    While I’m not opposed to having choices, I feel that the price is already at the “Pro” level as it’s significantly more than an equivalent AP from Ubiquiti or TP-Link.

    When comparing it to gear from Asus and Netgear, you are really looking for a gamer class device, not a pro.

    For me personally, I would like to replace my TP Link Omada to simplify my environment, but not if it costs 2x as much for the same capabilities.

    I’m not gaming or doing heavy video editing over WiFi. I have a lot of mobile and IoT devices on my network, but almost none of them support WiFi6 as it’s not needed. Most still only work on 2.4Ghz and have very low traffic needs.

    But everyone has their own needs, I just want to make sure that Firewalla puts out a product they can support and that is rock solid.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Ben Larkins

    I agree with @heath 100%.  Having used the 3 AP7's now for about 2 weeks, I'm blown away. And my reference point is 3 Eero max 7's.  All wired backhaul, all the same location.  Yet way more stable, and ironically, better range on the FW AP7s. All for the same price (after factoring in the Gold SE) as the Eero Max 7's, with way more customization.  At this price it's perfect for me, running 100 devices on network (58 are IOTs - 9 speakers, 11 govee lights, 11 locks and smoke detectors, 17 plugs and bulbs and 11 cameras).  

    No drops, solid connections, the optimize wifi connection works great and seeing the signal strength per device has been awesome. 

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Troy Dampier

    TP-Link I have not had good experience with so I don't think they compare and have been hacked many times in the past.  As far a Omada or Ubiquiti I think you are forgetting about the cost of using their other infrastructure as well as the cloud management costs of those devices.  Same would be true for Ruckus.

    Those are corporate or enterprise solutions which if you implement properly with their full suite of products/tools cost way more than an AP7.

    I finally got one of my AP7s installed over the weekend and the zero trust, microsegmentation(losing 6ghz included) is definitely a plus as I hard-wire all my APs.  Those who do wireless back-haul are more impacted of course.  If i have to put one outside as well and suspect I will still try to hard-wire it.  I am not a fan of wireless back-haul.  But I guess I am old school :)

    My remaining issues with the AP7 is the lack of coverage/range due to the latest builds as I can't get it to work to Roku's without turning on 2.4ghz.  That and some security related things which I am unclear on due to the hard requirement of having to use LANs not VLANs and the required use of VLAN1. 

    I am probably going to have to put in a dedicated Managed switch just for the APs as I do not use VLAN1 on any of my current switches as it is usually bad security practice to do so. Also, there simply are not enough ports on the back of the AP7 to support the requirements in most larger homes to direct wire them to the back of the firewalla firewall so you will need a switch to connect them to get the port density.  

    I just hope the next version of the Firewalla firewall has all 10g SFP+ ports as with only two I am stuck with the AP7s uplink from the switch being 2.5gb :(  With video streaming the way it is that is just not enough bandwidth with multiple devices which use streaming services or IPTV. 

    I am just beginning to get the hang of the AP7s as I had a rough start due to the security lock down on my network.  So it is slow going, and I don't like to just plug things in and open all ports to install them as I want to know exactly what is required for the devices and only open those protocols/ports.

    Having worked with security in the field on a global level including managing CC transaction processing and outsourced services you will be amazed at the holes these types of devices create without proper lock down.

    Just my .02 cents.. 

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Stuart

    For both this and the AP I think that the best thing would be to get a less expensive device out there and get the software tested and polished. Later on, if the new hardware sells, it will be time to make more advanced versions of the hardware.

    I'd have pushed for a WiFi 6E AP to reduce the cost, and an 8-port switch without PoE. Maybe a single SFP uplink port and 7 or 8 2.5GbE ports. KISS :-) (I tend to lag behind with buying WiFi hardware since it takes a while to become good. The stuff that's early to market tends to be expensive and not really that wonderful in terms of stability and reliability. I'd still be running WiFi 5 if I didn't have some mobile devices that support 6 - I wanted to get the improved battery life that's possible with WiFi 6 vs. WiFi 5.)

    This "wish list" process just gets people going in all directions and the ask list grows like Topsy. I guess it can work when developing software features, but it is less useful IMO for a hardware project. Firewalla needs to get some affordable devices out there, get people using them, and then look into where they go from there.

    We can look at the process for Firewalla routers. They didn't start out with the Gold Pro. They started with much less ambitious hardware. It's taken some time to climb the mountain, but if you go too fast you fall down. :-)

     

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Troy Dampier

    @Stuart Make some good points.  But that would require some alpha/beta units to be shipped to the field and be tested prior to doing mass production.  Not sure Firewalla is willing to invest in that path.  I would be willing to participate in this but I do think that SPF+ would be the way to go for those as then you would be able to test both UTP and Fiber in the same test units.  What they finalize with for actual production could be a mixture of SFP+ and RJ45s but for field testing which I have participated in with other larger vendors it is good to have the flexibility at the port level to test all use cases. :)

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Troy Dampier

    @Stuart I am familiar with these as well and have pointed Firewalla to this vendor as I have 3 of there switches I am in the process of switching over to as a core.  

    2 x CRS326-24S+2Q+RM
    CRS504-4XQ-IN

    My guess is these are still going to be cheaper than the Firewalla switch when produced and mine switch at wire speed on ASICs ;)

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    heath

    @Troy - Omada is the business class hardware from TP-Link, and is very different from the commercial stuff.

    As to cost comparisons, I don’t have or need WiFi7 at this point, so I don’t use any of those APs. I have a couple EAP-610 and one EAP-245. All were probably around $100 or less per AP when purchased. And I use the software controller on a miniPC I have running Plex and a few other things, so there was no cost there. So for the cost of one AP7, I have a 3 AP setup with a dedicated controller.

    But it’s not integrated so I don’t see hostnames on the Omada controller that I have with reserved IPs in Firewalla.

    But as someone else said, I have several switches in my environment, including a POE+ and 2x 2.5/10GE switches (10GE between them) to connect some newer devices that support 2.5GE.

    So I’m all for a Wifi6E device that is lower cost that I can use to replace my Omada gear.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Derek Seaman

    @Heath I too run the Omada local controller with Firewalla. I wrote a python script which takes MAC addresses in Firewalla, along with the hostname I defined in FW, and syncs them to Omada for hostname consistency across platforms. 

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Stuart

    TP-Link is beholden to the CCP, so people outside of China may not want to use their products.

    I also wouldn't say that the TP-Link Omada equipment is really business-class. It's still pretty much consumer-grade hardware and software. It just has pretensions of grandeur. :-) (I don't think UniFi is really business-class either. Their Airmax gear is, and some of their other products are, but UniFi is not IMO.)

    I know that the appeal of UniFi is the single pane-of-glass, and Omada is kind of a cheap knockoff of UniFi. However, I never found that to be compelling and I used other products that I considered to be better. (Mikrotik, Ruckus, pfSense, Aruba switches...) I've taken this building block approach for many years and it's been flexible and effective.

    Ultimately you have to use the gear that you like, so my opinions and choices are my own. :-)

     

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Derek Seaman

    @Stuart I too believe in getting best of class gear for each purpose, and sacrifice 'single pane of glass'. My stack is:

    Ruckus R770 APs (Wi-Fi 7)

    Netgear M4300-16X 10G PoE+ switches (Core/APs)

    Firewalla Gold Pro firewall (10G)

    I'm very anti-Unifi due to their very spotty firmware record and el cheapo AP antenna design. Yes I have to use multiple UIs to do end to end configuration, but I feel each product is VERY good at its job.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    GK

    @Firewalla:  As far as the desktop version of a potential AP7 "Pro" is concerned, the same arguments of heat, size and cost were made for the Firewalla Gold Pro, and yet there is a market for it or you wouldn't be selling it. 
    Take a look at the Netgear RS700S (hardware specs) - they have put high performance hardware in a form factor similar to the AP7, and it is even a fanless design as far as I can tell. It can be had on sale nowadays for ~$550.  
    The point is 2x the price of an AP7 "regular" for a 12 stream config is OK (it will still sell just fine). Why don't you do a survey to gauge customer interest in a desktop "Pro" AP7 12 stream offering?   I am sure there are people like me willing to wait to get the Firewalla software stack on this kind of hardware (AP7 Pro) - I refused to buy any of the lower spec'd Firewalla firewall units because no amount of software features can compensate for non-performant HW (at least for me).  Is there any chance at all that you will put out an AP7 "Pro" offering (at least for desktop)?  OR its just not going to happen?  
    PS:  The gold pro is excellent, with good performance. 

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Firewalla

    Once we have the software ready, it will be extremely easy for us to build pretty much any type WiFi access point. And we sell more units, it is also possible ODM's will look us seriously, and give us more discounts, and priority. (remember, even though we have been around for a while, we are still fairly small compared to a typical consumer vendor... )

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Firewalla
    We are all set for the AP7 Desktop sale on Tuesday, March 4, 2025, at 9:00 AM PST!
    • We will send out an official confirmation email during the week of February 24, 2025.
    • Those who signed up via the survey will receive a small coupon (enough for a few eggs at a Bay Area Trader Joe's). This is a pre-order discount, a small thank you for helping us with the survey!
    • USA only
    • Shipping will begin around March 11; it will be in three or four waves.
    • We tried our best to order as many as we could based on the survey results. If people are shy about doing the survey, you may want to order early.
    • We will have more coming after this wave as well.
    • If you are wondering why we are not building enough ... the tariffs make pricing extremely difficult to predict. For a smaller company like us, we usually can't build up inventory when the pricing is fluctuating. The price may go up in the future.
    • Ordering link is https://firewalla.com/ap7 (price is what's there)
    Ceiling Mount Version (AP7 Ceiling)
    • USA only
    • Sale will start April 2, 2025 (tentative)
    • Shipping will begin two weeks after the sale
    • Due to parts constraints, we may not be able to ship all orders in April (but we are doing our best).
    • Pricing of this unit will be exactly the same as the AP7 Desktop.

     

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Manny Cavalier

    Why did you increase the price from the first batch last January?

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Ross Sargent

    They'd previously mentioned that prices were uncertain with Trump's tariffs kicking in, but that we'd likely see an increase. The price you're seeing now is very likely because of said tariffs coming into effect.

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Firewalla

    We always increase the price after the early access/beta period. And yes, the other reason is the tariff added for this batch. Since the tariff situation is still developing (example, qualcomm chips are TSMC or Samsung ...), it is highly likely the price will go higher in the future. 

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Troy Barwick

    @Firewalla Ubiquiti and others have not yet increased prices. I hope this is legit and not a political statement.

    -2
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Firewalla

    @Troy Barwick, we are a small company, and we charge our customers fairly. The tariff is real, and we have no room to 'swallow' this extra cost. Larger companies may have deep pockets and can afford to have a huge inventory, we don't have that much cash; what we do have is passion to make our product better!

    3
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Troy Barwick

    @Firewalla Good response. I understand your view, and yes you are a smaller company. Thank you.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Manny Cavalier

    @Firewalla So are we expecting that the first batch of the "world version" of AP7 will cost more than USD356? 

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Firewalla

    "world version" is TBD. From our survey, it doesn't look like there is much demand, and since the quantity is small, we don't even know if our ODM can build these. Even if they build, the price will be higher. The certification part is also costly, so even if we build, the world version will likely be CE based first. (EU+UK)

    -1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    thernus

    No definite unit outside of the US is very disappointing, I was under the impression it was going to happen.

    On a side note, what PSU is sent out with the desktop version, is it 110-240volts? ;)

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Firewalla

    We need more customers buying the AP7 to make the minimum quantity required, so help us spread the word, please.

    PSU is all universal. 

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Robert

    "world version" is TBD. From our survey, it doesn't look like there is much demand, and since the quantity is small, we don't even know if our ODM can build these. Even if they build, the price will be higher. The certification part is also costly, so even if we build, the world version will likely be CE based first. (EU+UK)

    Indeed very disappointed as well... As a Firewall user, I like what the company has produced and the niche they have filled for enthusiasts and was ready to buy.  ( maybe there will be grey market of second hand AP7 imports for those that want them..Some third party could make some money there! )  . So  alas  here is the the downside of a small company like Firewalla, they have great innovation but struggle  to deliver a global product against  the big boys like a TP Link, UnFi etc.   So it's a risk for us supporting them  as one of the big players may just buy you out( everyone is always for sale) , or if they cant , they will out innovate you with deep pockets.  Still hoping to see a Firewalla AP7 downunder at some stage as I am rooting for the little guy.  

    2
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Firewalla

    The real problem is that the demand for the AP7 outside of the USA is not yet big enough to meet our ODM's minimum build requirements. We are currently working with them to understand if we can pay more to get everything done. The best way to help us complete this survey https://forms.gle/7t34RHXBraHwdpB47

     

    0
    Comment actions Permalink

Please sign in to leave a comment.