The Firewalla Web Interface

Follow

Comments

18 comments

  • Avatar
    Richard Gaitskell

    The web interface is outstanding - very intuitive. Will there be a way to create (various) user-created filters that removes "mundane" IP traffic from the traffic list generated in "Insights"? Various filter lists could be created with Destination IPs and ranges of destination IPs to include or exclude. A filter list could also be added to be selecting the Destination IP addresses on the web page and adding them to a given filter so that the Destination IPs are included or excluded when the filter is applied. I imagine using this more to exclude mundane IP traffic so I can see the more unusual accesses in the Insights list. Many thanks,

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Firewalla

    @richard, make sense.  Will ask our developers to create an issue on this. 

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Arlo Miller

    This is AWESOME.  I just installed my firewalla 2 weeks ago and running the iOS interface on my ipad was making me so crazy that I was going to inquire about returning the device!

    An obvious addition I hope will be the general ability to manage the network settings through the web.  Right now, it seems like the web interface is primarily a portal to view info

    Areas that I especially like:

    The Devices screen! This is SO MUCH easier than looking through the device list on the ipad!  I love being able to click on the device and getting full details on it.  But, why can't we edit the network information for devices here?  It looks like we can add rules, but I'd like to manage the DHCP reservation here.    The device screen seems like an obvious location to go to to manage these settings.  For instance, I have a bunch of devices that need to have reserved IP addresses.  Doing that on the iOS interface was frankly a collossal PITA, but on the web interface, it could be dramatically easier if you allowed editing there

     

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Sukumar Patel

    Having it locally would have a massive boost in responsiveness. FWG to AWS to desktop, round trip is unwarranted.

    The web server on the local FWG could be updated as per existing schedule or with a separate package and versioning.

    Please do think about having it locally.

    2
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Alejandro Sánchez Márquez

    Hello folks,

    I love the firewalla web interface (with its limitations) and I use quite often. But I am struggling stupidly to manage more than one box from the firewalla web interface.

    If I press over "manage boxes" I have no option to add a second box. Neither I can from the phone app main screen. How is it done? Thanks.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Firewalla

    You will have to login via the other box to manage it.  The web interface to manage multiple units is not yet ready for prime time (as of the time of this message)

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Alejandro Sánchez Márquez

    Thanks for the prompt reply. While I am unsure about what you mean by that, the only way I found is to use an incognito mode to open the second one. I thought It was implemented, thanks.
    Cheers.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    mobius strip

    I really appreciate Firewalla devoting resources to a having web interface in addition to the phone apps for many reasons, including having a larger screen to view more information at once, exporting logs/events/etc, and what looks like a big picture goal of a user being able to import configuration settings lists such as the block list, and generally being able to save time.

    My compliments to the Firewalla devs for adding onto your existing development workloads what seems like an entirely new dimension of development, and making it all look easy in the process lol, considering how well formed and smooth it is already, particularly given how young this new long-term development effort is.

    Thanks! I look forward to continue trying new features and watching it grow.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Raul

    Please continue to invest time and resources to allow the Web interface to have all of the features and not just complement the mobile GUI, but allow full autonomy and independence. Myself and I believe many tech-savvy users use web GUI interfaces for many applications and servers and would benefit greatly from a well-defined and independent, feature-full web GUI.

    Thank you!

    2
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Nate Johnson

    I love the work on the web interface. Will a different login method ever be implemented? I spend a good portion of my day in an area without my phone. At times it would be nice to sign-in with user and password. Having another form of 2FA would be nice. Thanks!

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Ross

    I really enjoy the Purple and Gold products and look for better ways to use them for myself and others. That said, I have noticed that the MSP interface shows an events view that is missing on the desktop browser interface designed for non-MSP folk. However, the events are visible in the mobile app.

    This is an issue as internet events used to generate alarms that the admin could take action on, but now do not seem to raise any alarms. They are noted as events, but there is no other notification. Such events are just noted silently and hope they are discovered by someone looking.

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Herbert Smith

    One more vote here for making the Web interface the primary control source for Firewalla.   The phone screens are too small.  Very difficult to read. Not much room for a lot of information.

    The WebUI has lots of room.   And my computer screens are much easier to read and interact with.   The current WebUI is well behind the phone interface.   Hopefully you can get it up to speed shortly.

    And making the login process easier would be great.  And allow the login to be semi permanent would be a big improvement.

    5
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Alejandro Sánchez Márquez

    Could not agree more with the last comment. Upvoted

    And let me leverage this same comment to request the inclusion of target list management within the mobile app. It is a big pain not being able to include one new IP to one list on the go, because they can only me modified through web interface or MSP. Thanks.

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Michael Yuen

    I would like to add a feature request where clicking on Open in Desktop Browser would allow you to also open the web interface from the same mobile device itself without requiring a second device to scan a QR code with. That way I could either use the app or the browser from the same mobile

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Casper McFadden

    Web "Security Lookup" vendors to Match the Mobile Apps

     

    Can we have the number of Security Lookup vendors match what we have on the Mobile Apps.

    Makes it easier when trying to go through 30,000-50,000 Log Entries a day via the Web Portal and deciding to Block or Allow connections.

    Domain Security Lookup Missing in Web App - VirusTotal, Shodan, AbuseIPDB, Hurricane

    IP Security Lookup Missing in Web App - VirusTotal, Shodan, AbuseIPDB, Hurricane, GreyNoise

     

     

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    James Berry

    I appreciate your statement about a full web interface being local. But not having a local web interface at all makes specific scenarios (like diagnosing and changing internet connection properties) more difficult than it could be.

    The Unifi USG took an approach where the local web interface just contained some very core things:  Port configuration, status, IP address, Internet connection settings, reboot.   That way you can get the device connected to the internet and diagnose issues without the current dancing around you sometimes need with bluetooth/connecting via another router just to commission

     

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Firewalla

    Your phone app is still the main interface, and if the internet is down, it has the ability to configure the firewalla via Bluetooth. (which is likely can't be done with anything 'local')

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    James Berry

    Yes, I understand this - and I'm suggesting a local web interface with some key settings to allow you to get online would be better from a commissioning and diagnostic point of view - rather than have to get near the device and use bluetooth.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink

Please sign in to leave a comment.