New FWG, question about PiHole setup
I have been using an external Ras Pi with PiHole before i got my FWG and looks like i can just get rid of my Ras and install PiHole directly on my FWG?
-
https://help.firewalla.com/hc/en-us/articles/360051625034-Guide-How-to-install-Pi-Hole-on-Gold-Beta-
just follow these instructions, it’s easy and highly recommend.
-
Hey all,
I was also running PiHole on a Rasp 3b+ where all my network devices set the DNS to the Pi, PiHole wasn't managing DHCP (that was all done via the router), it just handled DNS filtering and upstream (using DNS-Crypt). Anyway, how does performance look when using a Firewalla Purple to docker run PiHole compared to running it native on a Pi 3b+? My PiHole instance had a gravity well of about 4.8m entries to block, and it runs this perfectly fine with about 30+ network devices.
Many thanks,
Ben
-
Ok that makes sense, I think there's 2Gb RAM in my FW Purple, though I'm pretty sure my Pi3b+ Only had 1Gb RAM (though its running the latest 32Bit RasberryPiOS and PiHole).
I'm just wondering if its worth keeping the RasPi PiHole and let it continue handling all the DNS filtering and upstream or move it over to a docker container on FW or just ditch it altogether and use the FW for DNS filtering etc.
It would be good if the FW had better list control, like adding in some of the various block lists out there, sadly the Target List functionality is seems only allows upto 200 entries per list). If I'm seeing this right.
-
The firewalla already has a list that's pretty large. At the moment it is north 70 million entries; unless you are really passionate about a list (for example log4j type of blocks), you really do not need to import other lists. Firewalla may block lesser (and alarm more if you are using the default mode) but if you tap on + and then "active protect" turn that into strict mode, it will likely to block a lot more.
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
14 comments