Firewalla Gold - Poor Torrent Performance

Comments

10 comments

  • Avatar
    Christopher Taylor

    Oh I see this is using an Intel N3160.  Either way..

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Firewalla

    Is your Dual WAN in load-balancing mode? and do you have equal weight across them? If you run just one circuit, do you get gigabit? 

    The reason I am asking is, dual behavior can be different ... and yes firewalla may have more load if you have connections that's keep on going up and down ... not sure this is impacting you; feel free to create a case, we can take a look 

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Christopher Taylor

    Yeah it's in load balancing, and it's working great for lighter loads

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Firewalla

    So you are getting gigabit with just one link? The ubuntu download load (the extra flows) is not that much, so I am curious if the issue is related to the load balancing part.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Christopher Taylor

    Ended up spending 12 hours yesterday learning how to set up ProxMox and OPNsense and configure all the features (wireguard VPN, ddclient dyndns, unbound DNS, suricata IDS, Zenarmor, and load balancing).  Got it all working eventually with some frustration, but it does what I was hoping Firewalla could do and now I can get full speed from torrents.

    -1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Firewalla

    Do you want help to look at the issue? I've just created a case for you. The Gold should have enough power to handle the traffic, just need to understand a bit how you are doing the testing

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Christopher Taylor

    Plugged in two gigabit cable modems into ports 3,4 and configured them for load balancing WAN. Verified fail over works fine. Verified that IP address websites return randomly one or the other. Verified fast.com achieves 2Gbps rate.

    Then downloaded two of the Ubuntu ISO install image torrents and noted that the bandwidth achieved was only about 600 Mbits. Noted that CPU usage was hitting 100% on the device during this time.

    Switched to higher end machine running OPNSense and now getting full data rate as expected.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Anthony Cogan

    We are just now having to send out a number of ISO's and have noticed this exact same issue, no seeding is happening. I have even opened and suspended the server with bi-directional traffic temporarily and the speeds are tremendously slow for anything coming down, and zilch for seeding. Has there been any update to this issue. If I need to, I can build another VM and do what the last poster put on running on different HW. I agree though with some of the other posts on here and the Internet, kinda disappointing at the moment, when I'm under the crunch and having spent over $500 to take some management load off my shoulder's now having to configure another solution. I'm hoping there is just a post I haven't seen yet to fix this. I've opened up, UDP & TCP ports, opened the whole darn thing, and performance stinks and seeding is non-existent.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Drew Larson

    Just adding my experience, Firewalla seems to be ass at handling torrents.. Either shut active protect/ad filtering off, bypass firewalla, or just suffer with it. Few years into owning a Firewalla Gold, and not too impressed. This product is for tech nerds to buy for their grandmas, not for power users.

    1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Firewalla

    Firewalla is flow based and if you are driving unlimited flows into the box, it will slow down. What you can do is limit the number of sessions used by p2p, or just disable monitoring of the device that's doing p2p. 

    0
    Comment actions Permalink

Please sign in to leave a comment.