Firewalla Blue and Wireguard
I have a blue (not plus) and Purple and am curious as to why the Wireguard client isn't available on Blue. Does Wireguard require significantly more RAM to run than OpenVPN?
-
good thinking. wireguard should be more efficient and should use less ressources than OpenVPN, isn't it? I'm using GL.inet mango router as wireguard-server in my home-network and it runs quite smooth. The small mango router is also USB-powered like firewalla and really a tiny box.
German's brand AVM Fritzbox will use wireguard as server and client in future release, just in beta state. Maybe fritzbox is having a bit more cpu and ram power than firewalla blue, but it is also hosting webserver (for configuration), ftp-server, samba-server, could act as phone-system, 5 times GBit-ports (one is for WAN, but could be converted for LAN-usage). Small router with a bit more cpu and ram power but lots of services running + wireguard in the future.
So i think, wireguard should also be possible in firewalla blue, isn't it?
-
The monitoring cost is on the "firewalla" side, it takes a lot of system resources (more memory, and a bit more CPU) to record, and manipulate the flows. We are unlikely to make another version without the logs.
@Rich, the blue plus is 20% faster and also 1GB of memory more. So it has the capability to run both OpenVPN + WireGuard with logging together.
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Comments
7 comments