Firewalla vs Palo Alto Firewalls

Comments

2 comments

  • Avatar
    Freddie Cash

    1. Yes, you can create vlan-based "sub-interfaces" on the Firewalla Purple and Gold.

    2. Yes, you can block access on a per-device basis, a per-group-of-devices basis, or a per-network basis.

    3. Yes, it appears you can set schedules on a per-rule basis.

    4. It uses a limited version of application-based filtering.  There's about a dozen applications that it understands natively (mostly social media), and there's some domain-based filtering for things like gaming sites, video sites, porn sites, P2P file sharing, etc.  But it's extremely limited compared to what a PA firewall can do.

    5. There is a web GUI, but it's tied into the app.  Meaning, you go to https://my.firewalla.com and it shows a QR code.  You scan the QR code using the app on your phone, and it logs the browser into the web GUI on the Firewalla device.  Then you have access to configure rules and view stats.  90% of the configuration is only done via the mobile app.

    6. No idea, I just plugged mine in yesterday.  :)

    7. There's a Smart Queue feature available in Purple and Gold that allows you to set bandwidth limits and priorities for certain traffic.  Very limited compared to what Palo Alto provides, but better than what Ubiquiti gateways provide.

    8. No SSL decryption.

    The Firewalla products are replacements for crappy ISP routers, consumer-grade routers you can get at Best Buy, and pro-sumer gateway products like Ubiquiti.  They are not replacements for enterprise-grade products like Palo Alto.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Dan Sinema

    Good info, thank you. I am in the same boat with a PA-220, nice rig but PITA to license. 

    I just picked up a Gold to replace the PA-220…also reboot on a PA-220 is measured in hours. LOL

    0
    Comment actions Permalink

Please sign in to leave a comment.