Google Wifi or Nest Wifi Mesh network with Gold Series (Beta) – Firewalla

Follow

Comments

40 comments

  • Avatar
    Michael Stump

    Disappointing that some of the advice from firewalla is to not use Google Nest WiFi. My entire home network has been running on this solution for over a year without issue. Until there's a true solution for this problem, my firewalla gold is sitting on my desk collecting dust.

    -1
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Firewalla

    @Michael, the problem with Google / Nest Wifi is, it does NOT do access point or bridge mode when in mesh, this is a limitation on the google side. It has nothing to do with Firewalla. All the major mesh (orbi, eero, velop ... ) have true bridge/AP mode when in a mesh. Google is the only one that supports bridge only on one unit, not a mesh.

    What you see here is just a way for us to get around that problem, until google starts to support bridge mode in mesh. Feel free to post to their forums and may be they listen to customers like we do :)

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Michael Marrah

    Should DHCP service on the switch be enabled?

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Taylor

    @ Michael Marrah... in my setup I do not use DHCP on the switch as firewalla has to serve as the DHCP server for all devices to track them. Hopefully you figured this out in the last four months:-) (noting for future readers).

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    jmraffin

    Hi, any word if the new Nest Wifi Pro will allow it to be set up in AP mode?

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Matt Hudson

    No it hasd bridge mode for a single point but no AP mode or bridged mode for mesh.

     

    The guide does work for the new Nest Wifi Pro however as another user mentioned I had to add an extra few addresses in the google wan dhcp scope to get all 3 points meshed together.  After that it worked fine after the last 2 steps were completed

     

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Pejman

    I have TP-Link Omada and purchased the Firewalla gold. my problem is that the Omada router doesn't have any bridge mode so I can't put the Firewalla between my ISP and Omada router. 

    I tried to setup the Firewalla using other option available to put the Firewalla between my main switch and the Omada Router (Firewalla in bridge mode). now the issue is I can't do any port forwarding because when I open it on my router, the Firewalla blocks it and doesn't support the port forwarding in the bridge mode.

    anyone managed to setup Firewalla and Omada router and use the full capability of Firewalla ?

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Firewalla

    @Pejman

    Can you double check with TP-Link again? they are pretty good with AP/Bridge mode support. I have not heard any router they have not supporting. (AP mode or bridge mode)

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Pejman

    Hi, 

    thanks for your prompt reply. TP-link supports all that when it is not being managed via Omada SDN. once you use a Omada controller to control all the TP-link devices in the network, then I don't see any functionality of putting the TP-link gateway in to bridge mode. 

    0
    Comment actions Permalink
  • Avatar
    Phillip Marquez

    My Nest WiFi Pros (3) reset this evening (for whatever reason, an update maybe?) and to my dismay one of the mesh pucks wouldn't connect.

    After some troubleshooting it looks like some speakers are now Thread border routers and they're trying to take up the DHCP spots normally used by my mesh pucks. 

    Some background: I have all my devices (80+) using FW static IPs (except the WiFi half of the mesh pucks, those are getting 192.168.86.x DHCP addresses from the primary Nest WiFi) which has proven rock solid with performance and no loss of functionality (VPN, DNS, Family Protect, the various blocks, etc. I even went so far as to manually rename all the devices in Google Home WiFi so I could setup groups and rules there as well (e.g. timers for kids' devices) since they were all generic names which makes configuring groups in the WiFi Pro config impossible.  When I got my FW I struggled with the instructions in OP but after sleeping on it I came up with an idea similar to some of the above posts - using temp password to isolate just the Nest WiFis to isolate and name appropriately to easily find them on a temp IP block, return the WiFi password to what all my devices are expecting then renaming and assigning static IPs to everything.  Once every device has its static IP, change IP block in Nest WiFi Pro back to 192.168.210.1 (this forces all those DHCP addresses to reset - no need to wait for them to time out) then wrap up the instructions from the OP.  After I put in the sweat to rename and assign static IPs (I already had a spreadsheet which I used prior to the FW which included MACs and desired last octets, so this helped immensely), I haven't had to touch a thing.

    OK, I thought, no problem - I'll just assign a static IP and add it to my spreadsheet.  Only problem is, for the first border router, that MAC address is already assigned (and weirdly, is actually using) a static IP in FW.  BUT, in the Nest WiFi devices list, I uncovered 2 devices with the same MAC address -- the first was "--" (this is the FW static IP which doesn't show up in the WiFi Pro device list), but the 2nd was taking up a 192.168.86.x IP address assigned by the WiFi Pro DHCP.  I couldn't for the life of me figure out if it was even possible to force a 2nd IP to that MAC address (I know next to nothing about Thread), so I gave up and opened up a few more DHCP addresses in the Nest WiFi Pro config and immediately my pucks came online.

    The end result is: my pucks are back on the WiFi DHCP along with the Thread border routers.  The remainder of my FW and Nest Wifi config remain the same and after a few hours of testing, all appears to be back to how it was prior to the issue happening this evening.  Solid speed, functionality appears to be untouched, etc.

    I figured I'd drop this here in case someone else is in the same boat and misses any border routers taking up their restricted/limited WiFi DHCP addresses.  Honestly, I'm not even sure how I caught it in the first place but that was the turning point for me to track down what was going on.

    0
    Comment actions Permalink

Please sign in to leave a comment.